stltoday.com reports the Rams have re-signed DE James Hall to a two-year contract. The new deal is no doubt less expensive than the contract in effect when he was cut last month. He was due $3.5 million for 2008, well in excess of his value to the team. Hall is a decent run-stopper but a big disappointment as a pass-rusher, with only 2.5 sacks last season.
Sadly, that was still good enough to make Hall the sack LEADER among Rams DEs, a group with about as much promise as the Kucinich for President campaign.
Think about it this way. Osi Umenyiora had a six-sack game for the Giants last season. Rams DT LaRoi Glover on his own had a respectable six sacks in 2007. The Ram DEs, however, totalled 5.5. All season.
Hall rejoins Leonard Little, Victor Adeyanju and Eric Moore, and I'm not sure there is a worse group of DEs in the NFL right now. Adeyanju and Moore are still waiting to get their SECOND career sack! Little turns 34 this season and is coming off an injury-filled, ONE-sack season. And he's the --proven-- commodity. Hall has exceeded five sacks in a season once. Adeyanju has one sack in two seasons; if he's ever going to show he can get to the QB, it better be soon. He's had maybe two or three good games as a Ram, counting preseason. Journeyman Moore has one sack in 22 NFL games.
It would be unconscionable for the Rams to head into 2008 with these four DEs, the same group they ended 2007 with. And looking at frankly how bad the Rams are at this position, I don't know why they bothered to bring Hall back, whether or not he's as good (bad) as any remaining free agent DE. If he's anything more than a camp body on this team, it's not a good sign for next year's pass rush. The Rams are going to have to hit on more than one DE in this year's draft to drag this carcass of a DE corps off the floor of the NFL.
Another note about Hall: the teams he's played on in his career have a won-lost record of 36-92. He's been on a 2-win team and three 3-win teams. Only in his rookie year of 2000 in Detroit did he play on a team with a winning record. His teams' winning percentage of .281 is one of the worst, if not the worst, mark for any NFL player.
03/09/2008
Once the question was posed, the Rams official laughed for a good 20 seconds, then told a reporter: "If that were the case, we might have to line you up at wide receiver."
Comment:
Hilarious. The Rams ARE one Torry Holt injury away from having nothing at the WR position. Somebody tell Mr. Front Office Funny Guy that if the Rams dumped Torry, besides having to line up no-names at WR, they'd have to line up 10,000 fans every week to fill all the rapidly-emptying seats.
Rumors swirl like March wind this time of year. But the Torry Holt trade rumors — to Philadelphia or Cincinnati, take your pick — are simply hot air, according to coach Scott Linehan. Linehan says the Rams aren't shopping their star wide receiver.
"There's no interest, no discussions about trading Torry Holt," Linehan said. "He's on our team, we want him on our team, and I hope he feels the same way."
Besides, it simply makes no sense to move Holt. The release of Isaac Bruce leaves Holt, Drew Bennett and Dante Hall as the Rams' top three wide receivers. The team needs to add another quality body at receiver, not subtract one.
Comment:
Jim Thomas is just stating the facts here, and I absolutely agree with him. And naturally, I would like to point out that the Rams HAD a "quality body" at receiver.
You know, the guy who's third all-time in receiving yardage?